Forums SEASHELL-COLLECTOR
whelk type --don't think they are dakshinavarti shank conch - Printable Version

+- Forums SEASHELL-COLLECTOR (http://forum.seashell-collector.com)
+-- Forum: Seashell Collector's Forum (http://forum.seashell-collector.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Shells identification Help (http://forum.seashell-collector.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: whelk type --don't think they are dakshinavarti shank conch (/showthread.php?tid=14901)



whelk type --don't think they are dakshinavarti shank conch - Shells85 - 04-16-2018

Thank you in advance for helping me identify these four shells.
I did find a lot of information about how whelk shells are confused with Dakshinavarti shankha conch shells which are quite valuable.
My research said that the conch shank has 3 to 7 ridges on the conlumnella. Am I correct that my 4 shells do not have these ridges ?
My guess is they are whelk shells but I can not figure out what type of whelk--Lighning, channel or knobby.
The blue shell looks different to me.
Are the blue and white shells more valuable than the white/brown ones


RE: whelk type --don't think they are dakshinavarti shank conch - paul monfils - 04-16-2018

The shell on the left in the first three pictures is Busycon carica. All the others are Busycon contrarium.


RE: whelk type --don't think they are dakshinavarti shank conch - Shells85 - 04-23-2018

Thank you for taking the time to identify my shells.